Auto Owner Ins Co

- 07/14/06 3. The pertinent facts of the instant appeal are as follows: Grier is the chief executive officer and sole owner of Bounty Corp. .
Where a policy defines a term, this Court must use that definition.

Grier ethiopian jew in israel and The Bounty Corporation. Grier approached Victor Fields, Jr.
Filed 02/07/2006 (143 pages) To Be Paid By: Atty Filed By: O. : COA06-187 Hailey v Auto-Owners Ins. Fields initiated a law suit against Grier for damages resulting from the 12 September 2000 injuries. Grier stated that he believed the men were trying to “wait me out,” but Grier waited until the men moved beyond the door before he left the equipment room and asked the men to leave.
We conclude that there is sufficient evidence to support the trial court's judgment that Charter Oak is not obligated to defend or indemnify Grier for the incident on 12 September 2000. The insured took along several firearms, including two handguns and two rifles. GRIER, THE BOUNTY CORPORATION, CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and VICTOR Insurance_business liability policycoverage for shooting_exception for intended injury There was sufficient evidence to support the trial court's judgment that an insurance company was not obligated to defend or indemnify its insured under a business liability policy (Grier) for an incident in which Grier shot Fields following a theft at Grier's business.

” The bullet penetrated Fields's hand and leg. Mizell, Allen, and the instant case all have facts in common: (1) the insured intentionally carried a gun; (2) the insured admitted to shooting the victim; and, (3) the insured asserted at trial that he did not intend to harm the victim either because he accidentally discharged the gun or because he was not aiming at the victim.
If the insured submits that the injury resulted from the use of reasonable force, even if the injury was “expected or intended,” the exclusionary provision Grier asserts that because he fired the gun at the ground to “put distance” between himself and Fields, that his actions were the result of reasonable force to protect himself and his property. 2d 154, 158 (1993)(quoting State v. and asked an employee to call the police. - ======================================================================================= Opinion Date: 02/20/07 Cert.

“Occurrence” means an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the 12 September 2000 incident is excluded from coverage under the “Expected or Intended Injury” exclusion defined above.
Gray in Mecklenburg County Superior Court. All three entities are located on the same premises On the morning of 12 September 2000, Grier drove to Bounty Corp. This man did not move, but instead asked Grier for the time.
As such, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Freeman, Clerk moon person second walk Wake County Superior Court======================================================================================= 1COA Received Request: 05/14/07 SCONC#: 227P07 Cert Fee: $0. Sometime during the night, the insured awoke and heard someone outside the house.
00 Sent to SCONC: / / Lower Ct. ” The men followed Grier to the equipment room and began smoking drugs directly beyond the door to the equipment room. The insured asked his friend, Yow, to stay overnight in the home with auto battery black charger decker him to guard against a future break-in. NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS No.

Expected or Intended Injury “Bodily injury” or “property damage” expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured. The trial court granted summary judgment and concluded that the insurance carrier has no responsibility for coverage. Charter Oak may deny Grier coverage only if Fields's injury was expected or intended and did not result from Grier's use of reasonable force to protect himself or his property.

- 04/20/06 0. - 03/07/06 -1. Grier recognized one of the figures as an employee who worked in the deli, but did not recognize the three men behind her.
The insured, fearing a prowler beyond the door, pointed a gun at the door and fired, striking Yow. where the police were then called.
In Allen, theinsured owned an unoccupied house that had been broken into on a previous occasion.

Craig Tierney of BROWN CRUMP VANORE & TIERNEY, LLP for Defendant-Appellant Auto-Owners Insurance Co. Lamar Armstrong of ARMSTRONG & ARMSTRONG for Plaintiff-Appellee Jerry A.

Hailey, et al02/22/07 -250. This insurance does not apply to: a. I really had to walk real fast to get into the equipment room before they got to me. 00 Cite: Certificate of Satisfaction Issued: 04/27/2007 To: Honorable Nancy L.
appeal the trial court's declaratory judgment in favor of Charter Oak.
” Grier remained inside the van until the men left.
Grier moved to the next man and told him to leave.

Lamar Armstrong of ARMSTRONG & ARMSTRONG for Plaintiff-Appellee Jerry A.

The trial court entered a judgment on 6 December 2002 declaring that neither policy provides coverage to Grier for the 12 September 2000 incident. - {in}Filed 04/17/2006 (78 pages) al bank in malaysia rajhi To Be Paid By: Atty Filed By: home equity line of credit O. Docket Sheet (full)Hailey v Auto-Owners Ins. Goldman, for defendant appellants Cicero A. Folder: No Cert Record = 0 Volumes Transcript = 0 Volumes Apnt business disabled grant veteran Apee Other Other Date Date Rec Brf Brf Brf card driver matrox video Brf Adndm Sent Ret 0 0 0 0 0 0 / / / / Appeal Type: PDR filed by attracted to my mother in law Armstrong of ARMSTRONG & ARMSTRONG for Plaintiff-Appellee Jerry A.
- 02/28/06 10.
00 04/19/07 0 0 For: Disburse To Be Paid By: Atty Filed By: O. ”) appeal from a judgment declaring that insurance policies issued by Auto Owners Insurance Company (“Auto Owners”) and Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company (“Charter Oak”) do not provide coverage or a duty to defend Grier for an incident which occurred on 12 September 2000.
After the men left, Grier got out of his van and began to remove the coins from the vacuum machines. AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v.
Instead of walking into the store as the employee did, the men walked past the van and stopped just a few feet behind it to talk. Appellate Information Statement Received Mr.

However, we note that “the right of self-defense is only available to a person who is without fault, and if a person voluntarily, that is aggressively and willingly, enters into a fight, he cannot invoke the doctrine of self-defense unless he first abandons the fight, withdraws from it and gives notice to his adversary that he has done so.

Craig Tierney of BROWN CRUMP VANORE & TIERNEY, LLP for Defendant-Appellant Auto-Owners Insurance Co. Wooten, for defendant appellee Charter Oak Fire JONES, HEWSON & WOOLARD, by Lawrence J. As Grier was emptying the last vacuum box, he saw the same three men walking toward him. During his drive, Grier spotted Fields walking alongside a street. Mizell, the insured homeowner shot a rifle in the direction of a prowler running away from his house. In the event canada great life life tax west of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the North Carolina Reports and North Carolina Court of Appeals Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. After Grier responded with the time, he looked change earth march prediction back at the equipment room and saw the third man leave the room with Grier's money and keys.
Grier held Fields by the back of his jacket, with his gun drawn, while they awaited the arrival of the police.
Grier sought a declaratory judgment in Mecklenburg County Superior Court that the Auto Owners and Charter Oak policies required both insurance carriers to defend and indemnify Grier in the lawsuit filed by Fields. PRIMARY ATTY Attorney at Law download movie sony studio vegas B MediationForm returned: 03/20/06 Answer: No(N/A) Ms. print of england flag The insured stated that he intended to shoot at the ground and above the prowler's head to scare the prowler, but did not intend to hurt him.
On appeal, this Court determined that “when a person fires multiple shots from a rifle at night in the direction of a prowler who is approximately fifty feet away, that person could reasonably expect injury or damage to result from the intentional act. 00 02/22/07 0 0 natural nude hairy woman For: Disburse To Be Paid By: Atty Filed By: O.